Week 3 – Key Practitioner Lesson One – ‘In Countenance of Kings’ by Justin Peck


Countenance of Kings is choreographed by Justin Peck from San Fransisco Ballet. Initially I felt a sense of confusion, freedom and disorientation. The feeling of freedom developed from the woman at the beginning taking her hair down and also the transition of setting from a more confined space to a large hall. This feeling was then enhanced by many more dancers joining her as soon as she's in the hall. However, the use of patterns and movement of the large cast created the piece to be quite disorientating and confusing, especially with the different camera angles as you didn't know where you were in the hall or what you should be focusing on.

After focusing on the movement of the dancers, I realised that there was quite a contrast between the classical moves but the foot wear of the dancers and the transitions of the movements also. All the movements in the piece were classical, however when ever the dancers went to change position they'd run to their destination. This also links to the dancers wearing trainers, It's as if Peck wants to challenge the "classical" ballet style and also portray a sense of liberty and that ballet is like a race to become the best at their profession. In addition to this there was a constant change of direction in the dancers movements, which I interpreted as the uncertainty of the dancing profession and that you never know where you will end up.

Justin Peck in this piece used many different choreographic devices to make the movements more interesting for the audience and more exciting. One choreographic device used was inversion between the first two dancers. This then links back to the woman at the beginning looking at herself in the mirror as the use of inversion is almost like dancing with a reflection. By using this technique, it could be interpreted that whilst in the dancing profession people tend to compare themselves a lot with fellow dancers and so instead of focusing on yourself you focus on other people.

Over all, the narrative I interpreted the choreography to have is that she is unsure of the path her career is taking and that she wants to explore different opportunities. However, during her fantasy all the dancers are helping each other and leaning on each other to create the movements. In addition to this they collectively create the shapes, for example the many circles would be broken and it would be incomplete. Therefore, her real life self realised this may not be the reality.


Comments

  1. You have gone into detail, and covered all questions. I like your interpretation on the narrative. Could you mention any choreographic techniques Justin Peck uses?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment Rachel, Justin Peck used argumentation in his piece as well as unison and accumulation.

      Delete
  2. I enjoyed reading this blog as you have stated lots of varied points. What areas of this piece did you like in particular?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment Mhairi, I really enjoyed the structure of the piece, for example how the number of people varied and built up.

      Delete
  3. I enjoyed watching the piece by Justin Peck partially due to the chaotic and confusing nature. Do you think the piece was intended to be confusing? And do you think it impacted the audience, maybe serving as a contrast to the stillness?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment Nathan. I fell as though the piece was intended to be confusing as I interpreted the piece to show the dancer's mindset and how she is unsure of the direction she would like to follow. I did think this impacted the audience as, the moment that there was stillness it felt as though there was clarity but then it would change back to the chaotic movement.

      Delete
  4. This is a very detailed blog. You have included many interesting ideas! Why do you feel an increase in the number of dancers added to the idea of freedom? Also, adding to the idea about the dancers wearing trainers, do you have any thoughts on the leotards they wear? Do they symbolise anything?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment Louisa, I feel like the number of dancers added to the sense of freedom because they all intertwined within one another but also because they were their own individual person as well. This is due to the fact that they all had a part to play within the piece. I felt like the use of the different leotards showed each dancers own personality whereas in class everyone is uniform.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 9 – Critical Review of Dance Piece #2

Week 11- practitioner evaluation

Week 10- Studio Performance